<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hyperlink Guerrilla &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperlinkguerrilla.com/category/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperlinkguerrilla.com</link>
	<description>Connecting Dots</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:03:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Instant Impacts Adwords Impressions</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperlinkguerrilla.com/2010/09/08/google-instant-impacts-adwords-impressions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperlinkguerrilla.com/2010/09/08/google-instant-impacts-adwords-impressions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hyperlinkguerrilla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperlinkguerrilla.com/?p=447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The just-announced Google Instant will provide yet another new twist in complexity for Adwords advertisers. For starters it may affect your impression data and quality score as noted here. While that one sinks in, here&#8217;s an entertaining Google Instant riff from Bob Dylan.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperlinkguerrilla.com/2010/09/08/google-instant-impacts-adwords-impressions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Enhanced CPC &#8211; Possible Help for Search Partner Performance?</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperlinkguerrilla.com/2010/08/21/google-enhanced-cpc-possible-help-for-search-partner-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperlinkguerrilla.com/2010/08/21/google-enhanced-cpc-possible-help-for-search-partner-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 19:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hyperlinkguerrilla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperlinkguerrilla.com/?p=431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week Google launched Enhanced CPC, yet another bidding option that sort of begins to fill the space between manual CPC bidding and Conversion Optimizer. It&#8217;s &#8220;intended&#8221; to adjust bids automatically based on the likelihood of a keyword to convert, EVERY time that keyword qualifies for an auction. Google gives the following examples of how [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperlinkguerrilla.com/2010/08/21/google-enhanced-cpc-possible-help-for-search-partner-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>robots.txt &#8211; Excluded page still showing in Google Index? Here&#8217;s Why.</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperlinkguerrilla.com/2009/10/06/robots-txt-excluded-page-still-showing-in-google-index-heres-why/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperlinkguerrilla.com/2009/10/06/robots-txt-excluded-page-still-showing-in-google-index-heres-why/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hyperlinkguerrilla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperlinkguerrilla.com/?p=341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This video from Matt Cutts explains why those excluded pages still show up in Google&#8217;s index, but without a title or snippet. Basically it turns out that if they find links to a page they&#8217;ll still index it using the rationale that, if others link to it, it may have some value to some searchers. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperlinkguerrilla.com/2009/10/06/robots-txt-excluded-page-still-showing-in-google-index-heres-why/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the impact of Google Adwords new top bid rule?</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperlinkguerrilla.com/2007/08/13/what-is-the-impact-of-google-adwords-new-top-bid-rule/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperlinkguerrilla.com/2007/08/13/what-is-the-impact-of-google-adwords-new-top-bid-rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hyperlinkguerrilla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperlinkguerrilla.com/google/what-is-the-impact-of-google-adwords-new-top-bid-rule/32/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of weeks ago Google announced that it was changing the way top position is determined on an Adwords keyword. The old method was to use the actual highest paid click. The new method is using the max bid. I actually haven&#8217;t taken the time to sort through the implications. Sure enough, if you [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperlinkguerrilla.com/2007/08/13/what-is-the-impact-of-google-adwords-new-top-bid-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cutts: Google continues to have a strong focus on search</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperlinkguerrilla.com/2007/06/20/cutts-google-continues-to-have-a-strong-focus-on-search/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperlinkguerrilla.com/2007/06/20/cutts-google-continues-to-have-a-strong-focus-on-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hyperlinkguerrilla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperlinkguerrilla.com/google/cutts-google-continues-to-have-a-strong-focus-on-search/24/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt Cutts comments on a New York Times article for which a reporter was given unprecedented access to quality review meetings at Google. He also refutes claims from various directions that Google has slacked off on their commitment to improving search relevance in favor of more commercial prioritities.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperlinkguerrilla.com/2007/06/20/cutts-google-continues-to-have-a-strong-focus-on-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s Supplemental Index: &#8220;Why am I in Google Hell?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperlinkguerrilla.com/2007/05/28/why-am-i-in-googles-supplemental-index/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperlinkguerrilla.com/2007/05/28/why-am-i-in-googles-supplemental-index/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 20:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hyperlinkguerrilla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperlinkguerrilla.com/google/why-am-i-in-googles-supplemental-index/8/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google&#8217;s Matt Cutts responds to Andy Greenberg&#8217;s Condemned To Google Hell article in Forbes. As always Matt zeroes in on some pretty blatant practices (substantial non-relevant reciprocal links for starters) that likely caused the site to end up in Google&#8217;s supplemental index. The sad thing is that site owners are often following bad advice without [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperlinkguerrilla.com/2007/05/28/why-am-i-in-googles-supplemental-index/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Buys Feedburner</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperlinkguerrilla.com/2007/05/28/google-buys-feedburner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hyperlinkguerrilla.com/2007/05/28/google-buys-feedburner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 19:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hyperlinkguerrilla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperlinkguerrilla.com/google/google-buys-feedburner/7/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TechCrunch broke the news that Google has aquired popular feed management service FeedBurner, for what some consider a &#34;paltry&#34; $100M. Some are speculating that Google Ads in FeedBurner feeds aren&#8217;t far behind.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hyperlinkguerrilla.com/2007/05/28/google-buys-feedburner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

